A Prayer for Egypt: Satire Invokes Cinematic Downfalls for the 'Dwarf'"

 Of course. This is a profound and culturally rich piece of satire that uses classic Egyptian cinema to deliver a powerful political message. Here is the translation and analysis for an international audience.

🎭 Publication-Ready English Translation

A Prayer for Egypt: Satire Invokes Cinematic Downfalls for the 'Dwarf'"

(Text)

O God,grant Egypt glory through one of two endings for the "Dwarf," which would please the eyes of its people:

The end of 'Atrees', the gang leader in the film "A Touch of Fear" ("Shay' min al-Khawf"), when the subdued village revolted against his tyranny, rising as one to burn the edifice of injustice and demolish it upon his head.

Or the end of 'Esran the Hyena', the thuggish, professional killer in the film "The Bystander" ("Al-Halfoot"), when a simple, common man confronted him, and he died of terror at his hands.

---

🔍 Analysis for the Non-Egyptian Reader

This text is a highly sophisticated piece of political satire that uses allegory from two iconic Egyptian films to articulate a deep desire for the end of the current government. It is not just a critique but a prayer and a prophecy, wrapped in cultural code.

Decoding the Cinematic Allegories:

The "Dwarf" is, as in previous texts, a derogatory nickname for President Abdel Fattah El-Sisi. The author proposes two possible "glorious" endings for him, both drawn from famous movies that every Egyptian would understand.

· 1. The End of 'Atrees' ("A Touch of Fear" - 1969): The People's Uprising

  · The Story: 'Atrees' is a wealthy, sadistic landowner who tyrannizes a poor village. He believes his power, money, and intimidation make him invincible.

  · The End: The entire village, once cowed and submissive, finally reaches a breaking point. They collectively rise up, set his mansion on fire, and destroy his symbol of power with him inside it.

  · The Political Meaning: This ending represents a mass popular revolution. It is a vision of the Egyptian people collectively overcoming their fear and tearing down the entire oppressive system in a decisive, cathartic explosion of people power. The phrase "as one" is crucial—it envisions a unity that can topple the seemingly unshakable ruler.

· 2. The End of 'Esran the Hyena' ("The Bystander" - 1986): The Individual's Defiance

  · The Story: 'Esran' is a notorious, feared hitman and crime boss who terrorizes a neighborhood.

  · The End: He is not killed in a dramatic fight. Instead, he is confronted by an ordinary, "simple" man who stands up to him. Faced with this unexpected and principled courage, the monstrous 'Esran' is so shocked that he literally dies of a heart attack from sheer terror. His power was entirely dependent on the fear he instilled; once that fear was broken, he collapsed.

  · The Political Meaning: This ending represents a moral and psychological collapse of the regime. It suggests that the ruler's power is a facade, sustained only by the population's submission. The moment a single person shows fearless defiance, the entire structure of control could implode from within. It is a victory of courage over brute force.

💡 The Satire in a Nutshell

This piece is a masterful use of cultural memory to frame a contemporary political struggle. By referencing these two specific film endings, the author accomplishes several things:

1. Articulates a Collective Desire: It clearly expresses a widespread wish for the current leader's downfall.

2. Provides Two Models for Change: It outlines two possible paths to that downfall: a massive, collective uprising (the 'Atrees' model) or a sudden, internal collapse triggered by acts of individual bravery (the 'Esran' model).

3. Frames the Ruler as a Cinematic Villain: It places the president in the role of a classic, doomed movie antagonist, assuring the audience that, like all such villains, his end is inevitable.

4. Offers a Veiled Critique: Using allegory allows the author to voice an extremely dangerous political statement safely, under the cover of discussing cinema.

Ultimately, this is not just satire; it is a piece of political poetry that uses the nation's shared cinematic heritage to imagine a future without its current ruler.