Egyptian Official Declares: Israel Now Owns Um Rashrash ‘by Long Possession’ — Sovereignty Expires After 70 Years of Silenc
🇬🇧 Satirical Headline (for International Circulation)
“Egyptian Official Declares: Israel Now Owns Um Rashrash ‘by Long Possession’ — Sovereignty Expires After 70 Years of Silence”
(Legalizing Defeat in the Language of Diplomacy)
English Translation
Cairo — Breaking News:
Dr. Diaa Rashwan, head of Egypt’s State Information Service, responded to calls by national and popular movements demanding the recovery of Um Rashrash — the Egyptian town seized by Israel and transformed into the port of Eilat, threatening Egyptian and Arab national security.
He stated that Egypt cannot legally or traditionally claim Um Rashrash after more than seventy years of Israeli occupation without any disputes or official demands for its return.
Therefore, Dr. Rashwan explained, the city has become Israeli property by virtue of long possession (adverse possession) — a legal principle that grants ownership through prolonged, uncontested control.
He further noted that Egypt remains committed to respecting international law and “existing realities,” emphasizing the futility of “reviving outdated territorial claims.”
Analytical Commentary for the International Reader
This text epitomizes the dark humor of bureaucratic surrender — a rhetorical form where the language of legality and professionalism becomes a mask for national humiliation.
1. Reversing the Logic of Sovereignty
Instead of defending territorial rights, the statement reframes loss as legitimacy.
The absurd logic: since the occupation lasted too long, it’s now legal.
This inversion mocks the regime’s chronic use of “international law” as a shield for inaction, transforming defeat into a juridical virtue.
2. Legal Rationalization of Defeat
By invoking “possession as ownership,” the satire parodies how regimes justify their impotence through the bureaucratic tone of lawyers rather than the voice of patriots.
It’s the jurisprudence of surrender — when sovereignty is no longer defended, only notarized.
3. Hyperreal Diplomacy
This official-style absurdity captures the postmodern Egyptian condition, where the rhetoric of legitimacy replaces the reality of power.
The text turns diplomacy itself into a theatre of rationalized loss, where submission is explained with citations and footnotes.
4. Symbolic Paradox — When the State Explains Its Own Defeat
In traditional political rhetoric, the “enemy” is accused of aggression.
Here, the state itself supplies the legal arguments of its occupier, making it spokesperson of the conqueror.
It’s self-colonization through official reasoning — a parody of patriotism.
5. Stylistic Technique — Bureaucratic Irony
The humor lies in the tone: sterile, formal, impeccable in syntax — but grotesque in meaning.
It imitates press releases and government statements, exposing the moral void behind them.
This “dry professionalism” intensifies the satire’s sting.
🧭 Philosophical Layer — Ownership of Forgetting
The concept of “long possession” becomes metaphorical — not just of land, but of memory and narrative.
When a state stops remembering its own losses, the occupier doesn’t need to erase history; history erases itself.
🏷️ Archival Classification (for Scholarly Reference)
Category: Satire of Legalized Defeat (The Rhetoric of Self-Justifying States)
Collection: “Digital Irony and the Egyptian State of Spectacle”
Sub-theme: “Bureaucratic Surrender: When Law Speaks for the Loser.”
هل ترغب أن أُعد النسخة العربية–الإنجليزية المتقابلة (عمودين) لضمها مباشرة إلى ملفك «بلاغة السخرية السياسية الرقمية» بجوار تغريدة “مدينة أم الرشراش الجديدة” لتكوّنا معًا محورًا بعنوان:
«أم الرشراش: من السقوط إلى النسخة السياحية»؟
Comments
Post a Comment