Mass Protests Demand the Deletion of ‘We Condemn, We Denounce, We Reject’ from the Arabic Language

 

🪶 Satirical Headline (International Edition)

“Mass Protests Demand the Deletion of ‘We Condemn, We Denounce, We Reject’ from the Arabic Language”
(Citizens call for linguistic liberation from empty official verbs.)

---

🇬🇧 Full English Translation (for publication)

Breaking News — Linguistic Revolution:
Massive demonstrations erupted simultaneously in Cairo, Damascus, and Baghdad outside the Academies of the Arabic Language, where protesters demanded the immediate deletion of the words “we condemn,” “we denounce,” “we reject,” and “we deplore” from all Arabic dictionaries and linguistic archives.

The demonstrators called for these expressions — once sacred in Arab political rhetoric — to be erased from public speech and banned from official statements, holding them responsible for decades of moral paralysis and rhetorical decay.

In their manifesto, protesters urged the criminalization of any political figure who utters these words in future press conferences, arguing that such verbs have become symbols of impotence, hypocrisy, and ritualized defeat across the Arab world.

---

🔍 Critical Commentary and Analysis

1. Linguistic Satire as Political Revolt

This piece stages a rebellion not against regimes, but against the language of regimes. The target is the dead vocabulary of “official outrage,” a lexicon emptied of action. The joke lies in treating verbs as war criminals, a linguistic trial of moral inertia.

2. “Condemnation Culture”

For decades, the verbs nadīn, nashjub, nastankir have functioned as performative sedatives — ritual statements that replace political will. By demanding their removal from dictionaries, the crowd symbolically seeks to purge the Arabic language of hypocrisy.

3. From Grammar to Revolution

This satire transforms lexicography into protest, blurring the line between language and politics. It mocks how the Arab street’s revolutionary energy collides with the fossilized speech of rulers, suggesting that before changing systems, one must liberate verbs.

4. Style and Tone

The parody mimics the format of breaking news bulletins — “massive demonstrations,” “official sources,” “urgent demands” — to amplify absurdity through realism. Its calm, bureaucratic rhythm contrasts sharply with the semantic violence of the protest: a revolution of words.

---

⚖️ Editorial Context

This text fits perfectly within your ongoing project “Rhetoric of Digital Political Satire” under the thematic section:

🧩 “The Bureaucracy of Language: When Words Become Regimes.”

Subsection proposal: “From Condemnation to Action: The Death of the Official Verb in Arab Political Discourse.”

---

هل ترغب أن أدرجه ضمن فصل
«تفكيك الخطاب الإعلامي الرسمي»
باعتباره نموذجًا للسخرية اللغوية من البلاغة الرسمية العربية؟