New Gov't Decree Mandates Citizens Carry, Renew "Certificate of Good Conduct" Every 6 Months or Face Jail

 Of course. The text is a brilliant piece of satire, and I have prepared it for international publication with a full analysis, continuing our established format.

English Translation

New Gov't Decree Mandates Citizens Carry, Renew "Certificate of Good Conduct" Every 6 Months or Face Jail

A surprising government decree mandates that every citizen and resident obtain a criminal record certificate—known as the "Feesh wa Tashbeeh"—and renew it every six months.

A copy must be submitted to the investigations department in their residential district, and the individual must carry the valid original with them at all times during their movements and travels, alongside their ID card or passport, as it is considered a certificate of good conduct and behavior.

Anyone who violates this decree will be subject to the force of law, facing imprisonment, a fine, or both.

The certificate, whether standard or expedited, will be issued to citizens for a fee in Egyptian Pounds, while residents must pay in US Dollars.

---

Analysis & Explanation for the Foreign Reader

This text is a masterful satire of bureaucratic overreach, state surveillance, and economic disparity. The humor is layered in the absurd yet plausible escalation of a real administrative procedure.

1. The Satirical Premise: The "Good Conduct" Passport

The piece takes a real document—the criminal record certificate,colloquially known in Egypt as "Feesh wa Tashbeeh" (literally, "the Record and the Identification")—and pushes its logic to a dystopian extreme. In reality, this certificate is typically required for specific purposes like certain jobs, visas, or licensing. The satire proposes making this proof of a clean record a mandatory, perpetually renewed internal passport, necessary for simply moving within one's own country.

2. Deconstructing the Satirical Critique:

· Renewal Every Six Months: This is the core of the bureaucratic absurdity. It creates a permanent state of administrative probation for every single person, turning a routine procedure into a relentless cycle of proving one's innocence to the state.

· Carrying it at All Times: This directly satirizes the fear of a surveillance state and the erosion of personal freedom. The requirement to couple this "certificate of good conduct" with one's official ID suggests that citizenship itself is conditional upon perpetual, state-verified good behavior.

· Submission to the Local Investigations Department: This detail evokes the image of a police state, where local security apparatuses maintain detailed, up-to-date files on the moral and legal standing of every individual in their district.

· The Currency Dicharchy (Citizens vs. Residents): This is a sharp critique of economic policy and inequality. Mandating that residents pay in US Dollars while citizens pay in Egyptian Pounds satirizes:

  · The existence of a dual economy, where access to dollars is a major privilege and a source of significant financial strain for the state and many citizens.

  · The perception that the government prioritizes extracting hard currency from foreigners, often at the expense of the local population's economic reality.

3. Context: The Real "Feesh wa Tashbeeh"

The satire is effective because it is grounded in a real and familiar bureaucratic hassle for Egyptians.

· The Real Document: The criminal record certificate is an official document from the Ministry of Interior that states whether an individual has a criminal history.

· Actual Use: It is genuinely required for many formal procedures, including employment (especially in government, banking, and education), obtaining licenses, and for immigration purposes when applying for visas to many foreign countries.

· The Satirical Exaggeration: By taking this necessary but occasional document and making it a constant companion, the writer critiques a system that is already perceived as overly bureaucratic and suspicious of its own citizens.

In essence, this text is a critique of a government that treats its people as perpetual suspects. It highlights the burdens of bureaucracy, the anxiety of state surveillance, and the economic pressures of a two-tiered currency system, all through the lens of a single, brilliantly conceived fictional decree.

I am ready for your next text. The chronicles of bureaucratic satire continue to provide sharp insights into the modern state.