"Madbouly's Disappointment: The War Ended Too Soon – We Had Plans to Raise Prices"

 

Comprehensive Analysis: "Madbouly's Disappointment: The War Ended Too Soon – We Had Plans to Raise Prices"

When Peace Becomes a Crisis for the Government: The Ultimate Satire of Austerity Politics

A Satirical Text by Al-Nadim Al-Raqmi (The Digital Nadim)

---

Full English Translation

---

Prime Minister Dr. Mostafa Madbouly, in his first comment on the cessation of the Iranian-American war, expressed his disappointment at the speed with which the war ended, before the government could complete its plans to raise the prices of fuel, electricity, gas, the metro, trains, and all government services, and to blame all of this on the war and its economic effects, such as the suspension of maritime navigation in straits and sea lanes, rising oil and gas prices, the contraction of tourism, Suez Canal revenues, and remittances from Egyptians working abroad, etc.

Dr. Madbouly added that he had received strict instructions from the President to quickly find other pretexts on which to pin price hikes, inflation, the collapse of the pound, and the deterioration of citizens' living standards. These pretexts could be wars, epidemics, the cutoff of Gulf rice, or the stoking of regional geopolitical tensions—whether with Sudan, Gaza, Libya, Ethiopia, Somalia, or even the Houthis in Yemen—to find a way out of the economic predicament after the end of the Iran-US war and the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz for navigation.

Madbouly said that the government is seriously considering establishing regular, periodic schedules for raising prices, taxes, and service fees without needing to look for external justifications that may not happen, especially if global peace and security prevail. This, he noted, would place the government in great embarrassment every time it raises prices while ignoring increases in salaries, pensions, service improvements, and the provision of essential goods for citizens.

---

Introduction: When War Is a Business Opportunity for the Government

This text by Al-Nadim Al-Raqmi represents one of the most painfully revealing satires in his project. It exposes the mechanism by which failing governments operate: searching for any external crisis to justify domestic austerity policies. The text imagines Egypt's Prime Minister expressing "disappointment" that the Iran-US war ended too quickly, before he could complete plans to raise prices using the war as a cover.

The satire operates on multiple levels:

· Explicit confession: The government was using the war as a cover for price hikes.

· Disappointment in peace: The end of war is not a cause for joy but for regret.

· Hunting for new enemies: Instructions to find other pretexts (wars, epidemics, tensions).

· The audacious idea: Establishing regular schedules for price increases without any justification.

---

Part One: Literary and Rhetorical Analysis – The Language of Open Scandal

1. "Disappointment at the Speed with Which the War Ended"

This phrase is the peak of moral inversion. In any normal context, the end of war is cause for celebration. Here, it is cause for "disappointment." The satire reveals that the government was profiting from the war to justify its unpopular policies.

2. "Before Completing the Government's Plans to Raise Prices of Fuel, Electricity, Gas, Metro, Trains, and All Government Services"

This is a shocking detail: the government has pre-existing "plans" to raise the price of everything. The war was merely a cover. "All government services" means nothing will be exempt.

3. "Blame All of This on the War and Its Economic Effects"

This exposes the mechanism: price hikes have nothing to do with the war, but the war was a "pretext" (ta'liq). The real economic effects of the war were just an excuse.

4. "The List of Ready-Made Pretexts"

Madbouly lists alternative pretexts the President instructed him to find:

· Wars (with Sudan, Gaza, Libya, Ethiopia, Somalia, the Houthis)

· Epidemics

· Cutoff of Gulf rice

· Stoking regional geopolitical tensions

This list is an admission that the government uses any crisis to justify its policies. As if crises are commodities to be picked off a shelf.

5. "To Find a Way Out of the Economic Predicament"

"A way out" (makhraj) means the government is looking for an escape hatch from responsibility. The economic crisis is real, but the solution is not reform—it is blaming others.

6. "Regular, Periodic Schedules for Raising Prices, Taxes, and Service Fees"

This audacious idea is the peak of the satire. Instead of searching for external pretexts (wars, epidemics), the government proposes raising prices "regularly and periodically" without any justification. This is an admission that price hikes are permanent policy, not a reaction to crises.

7. "Without Needing to Look for External Justifications That May Not Happen"

This is an explicit admission that previous justifications "may not happen"—meaning they were fabricated or exaggerated. "If global peace and security prevail" means the government fears peace itself, because it deprives them of excuses.

8. "This Would Place the Government in Great Embarrassment"

This is an admission that the government knows it is unjust. "Embarrassment" is the feeling of shame, but it does not stop the government from proceeding. "Ignoring increases in salaries and pensions" means the government knows it is deliberately neglecting citizens' rights.

---

Part Two: Political Analysis – The Government as an Excuse-Seeking Machine

1. The Admission of Exploiting War

The text portrays the government as an entity waiting for crises to exploit. The war was not the real reason for price hikes; it was an opportunity. Its early end is a "disappointment."

2. "Strict Instructions from the President"

Madbouly speaks of "strict instructions" from the President to find other pretexts. This reflects centralized decision-making and the absence of institutions. The President directs, the Prime Minister executes.

3. The Ready-Made List of Enemies

The list includes:

· Sudan (Renaissance Dam crisis, border tensions)

· Gaza (Israeli-Palestinian conflict)

· Libya (civil war)

· Ethiopia (Renaissance Dam)

· Somalia (instability)

· The Houthis in Yemen

This is a list of every regional crisis file. The government is ready to use any of them as a pretext, even if not directly related to Egypt.

4. "Stoking Regional Geopolitical Tensions"

This phrase suggests the government might resort to creating crises (stoking) rather than just exploiting existing ones. This is a serious accusation: the regime may manufacture enemies to stay in power.

5. The Fear of Peace

"Global peace and security prevailing" is the government's nightmare. Peace means losing excuses. This is a satirical reflection of a politics that needs enemies to justify its existence.

---

Part Three: Economic Analysis – Austerity Without Cover

1. "The Government's Plans to Raise Prices of Fuel, Electricity, Gas, Metro, Trains"

This is a near-complete list of essential services. Raising their prices increases the cost of living for citizens. The government planned these hikes regardless of the war.

2. "Blame All of This on the War"

This is an admission that the war was just a cover. Economically, price hikes can sometimes be justified (e.g., rising import costs). But the text reveals the government would have raised prices even without a war.

3. "Cutoff of Gulf Rice"

"Gulf rice" refers to Gulf financing (aid, deposits, investments). Its cutoff means losing a major source of funding. The government seeks alternatives: either a new war or harsher austerity.

4. "Regular Schedules for Raising Prices and Taxes"

This is permanent, programmed austerity. Instead of structural reform (improving productivity, fighting corruption, attracting investment), the government chooses raising prices and taxes as the easy solution.

5. "Ignoring Increases in Salaries and Pensions"

This is an admission that the government raises prices without raising incomes. Inflation erodes what little purchasing power remains. Citizens become poorer with each increase.

---

Part Four: Social Analysis – The Citizen as Permanent Victim

1. The Citizen's Absence from the Equation

In the government's calculations, the citizen is absent. No one asks: how will citizens bear these increases? No one thinks of raising wages. The citizen is merely a passive recipient of decisions.

2. "Great Embarrassment"

The government admits it will feel "embarrassed" every time it raises prices without increasing wages. But "embarrassment" is not an obstacle. The regime continues its policy despite recognizing its injustice.

3. Hunting for External Enemies

The government needs an "enemy" to justify its policies. This reflects a siege mentality: we are in a permanent state of war, so we must endure austerity. When there is no real enemy, one is imported from the list.

4. Erosion of Trust

The text reflects the collapse of trust between citizen and government. Citizens now know that crises were just excuses. The government knows that citizens know. But the game continues.

---

Part Five: The Text in Al-Nadim's Project – The Economic Crisis Trilogy

This text completes an economic crisis trilogy in Al-Nadim's work:

Text Focus

Exporting Repression An alternative solution to the budget deficit

Shablanga Street War Raising prices of cotton stalks and irrigation

This Text Searching for pretexts to raise prices

Each text reveals a different face of austerity politics: sometimes through repression, sometimes through raising input prices, sometimes through hunting for external enemies.

---

Part Six: Deep Symbolic Meanings

1. "Disappointment at the War's End" as Symbol of Inverted Values

This phrase symbolizes the inversion of all values. Peace becomes hated, war becomes desired. The regime needs violence to justify its existence.

2. "The List of Pretexts" as Symbol of Importing Crises

The government does not merely exploit existing crises; it seeks to "stoke new tensions." This is manufacturing crises: enemies are not real but imported.

3. "Regular Schedules" as Symbol of Programmed Austerity

This idea symbolizes the normalization of austerity, turning it from exception into system. Citizens will never know when increases will stop.

4. "Great Embarrassment" as Symbol of a Dead Conscience

The government feels "embarrassment," but it does not stop. This symbolizes a dead conscience that does not prevent action, only causes superficial discomfort.

---

Part Seven: Conclusion – The Government That Waits for Disasters

This text is one of Al-Nadim's most scandalous, portraying a government that eagerly awaits disasters. War was not a catastrophe to be avoided but an opportunity to be exploited. Its early end is a "disappointment."

The deeper message: When a government needs war to justify its policies, it has lost all legitimacy. When it fears peace, it lives on conflict. When it plans regular schedules for price hikes without justification, it has abandoned any attempt to persuade its citizens.

---

Satirical Conclusion

"In his office, Madbouly stared at the calendar. The war had ended early. The price-hike plans were incomplete. The President called: 'Find a new war. Any war. Sudan, Gaza, Libya, Ethiopia, Somalia, the Houthis. We need a way out.' Madbouly took out his list. He began calling ambassadors. The next day, the government announced a state of high alert due to tensions in... no one knew where. The important thing was that prices went up. In the street, a citizen asked: 'Why?' His friend replied: 'A new war.' 'Where?' 'I don't know. But prices went up.'"

---

Key Terms for International Readers

Term Explanation

خيبة الأمل Disappointment – a word expressing regret that the war ended, a complete inversion of values

تعليمات مشددة Strict instructions – decisions from the President, reflecting centralized power

الأرز الخليجى Gulf rice – Gulf financing (aid, deposits, investments) for Egypt

تأجيج التوترات Stoking tensions – accusing the government of manufacturing crises

جداول زمنية منتظمة Regular schedules – the idea of turning austerity into a permanent system

الحرج الشديد Great embarrassment – the government's admission that it knows its policies are unjust

---

Suggested English Titles

1. "Peace Is a Crisis: Madbouly's Disappointment That the War Ended Too Soon"

2. "The Pretext List: How Egypt's Government Plans to Raise Prices Without War"

3. "From War to Embarrassment: The Permanent Austerity Schedules of a Failing Government"

4. "Stoking Tensions for Price Hikes: A Satirical Masterpiece on Authoritarian Economics"

5. "When Peace Becomes the Enemy: The Government That Needs War to Survive"

---

Comprehensive analysis prepared for international publication

All rights reserved to the original author

Peace Is Bad for Business: When War Ends Before the Price Hikes Are Finished

Full English Translation

In his first public comment following the end of the Iranian-American war, Prime Minister Mostafa Madbouly expressed his disappointment at how quickly the war ended—before the government had completed its plans to raise fuel prices, electricity bills, gas tariffs, metro fares, train tickets, and various other public service costs, all of which were intended to be justified by the war and its economic consequences.

These consequences included disruptions in maritime trade through strategic straits and sea routes, rising oil and gas prices, declining tourism revenues, reduced income from the Suez Canal, and lower remittances from Egyptians working abroad.

Dr. Madbouly added that he had received strict instructions from the President to urgently search for alternative justifications upon which future price increases, inflation, the collapse of the Egyptian pound, and the deterioration of living standards could be blamed. These could include wars, epidemics, interruptions in Gulf financial aid, or escalating regional geopolitical tensions—whether involving Sudan, Gaza, Libya, Ethiopia, Somalia, or even the Houthis in Yemen.

The goal, he explained, was to find a suitable political exit for the worsening economic situation after the end of the Iran–U.S. war and the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz to international shipping.

Madbouly further stated that the government is seriously considering a new policy currently under study: establishing fixed timetables for regularly increasing prices, taxes, and public service fees without the need to wait for external crises that may never happen, especially if peace and global stability were to prevail.

Such peace, he noted, would place the government in an awkward position every time prices were raised while salary increases, pension adjustments, service improvements, and the provision of basic necessities for citizens continued to be ignored.

Analytical Essay

The Political Economy of Excuses: When Peace Becomes a Governmental Crisis

1. Introduction: War as Administrative Opportunity

This satirical text presents one of the sharpest inversions in political writing:

peace is treated not as relief, but as a bureaucratic disaster.

Rather than celebrating the end of war, the government mourns the loss of its most useful justification for economic hardship.

This inversion reveals a central argument:

crisis is not always a threat to power—sometimes it is its most valuable resource.

2. The Central Irony: Disappointment in Peace

The opening statement by Prime Minister Mostafa Madbouly is immediately striking.

His disappointment is not with war itself, but with the speed of its conclusion.

This reverses the expected moral order:

Expected Reaction

Satirical Reaction

Relief at peace

Frustration at peace

Concern for citizens

Concern for pricing schedules

The text suggests that:

external conflict had become economically functional.

War provided legitimacy for:

inflation

austerity

subsidy cuts

declining public services

Peace removes that shield.

3. Governance as the Search for Justifications

One of the strongest insights of the text is its portrayal of governance not as problem-solving, but as:

excuse management.

The Prime Minister’s main task is not economic reform, but finding convincing explanations for deterioration.

This reflects a broader political logic:

legitimacy is often maintained through narrative control rather than structural solutions.

The real administrative project becomes:

finding blame

rather than

producing reform

4. External Crisis as Permanent Infrastructure

The long list of possible future excuses—

Sudan

Gaza

Libya

Ethiopia

Somalia

Yemen

—is deliberately excessive.

Its purpose is to expose how external crises function as:

renewable political infrastructure.

These are not temporary emergencies.

They are recurring tools of domestic governance.

The system depends on:

permanent external turbulence.

5. Institutionalizing Inflation

Perhaps the most brilliant satirical moment is the proposal to create:

scheduled, regular price increases without needing external excuses.

This transforms inflation into:

routine governance

planned suffering

bureaucratic normality

The absurdity reveals a real political tendency:

exceptional hardship becomes permanent policy.

Emergency ceases to be temporary.

It becomes administrative design.

6. Selective Sacrifice

The text highlights a profound imbalance:

Prices rise regularly.

But:

wages do not

pensions do not

services do not improve

essential goods remain inaccessible

This exposes a familiar asymmetry:

austerity is systematic, relief is hypothetical.

Citizens are asked to absorb sacrifice indefinitely, while redistribution is endlessly postponed.

7. The Danger of Peace

The reopening of the Strait of Hormuz symbolizes something larger than shipping.

It represents:

the return of normal expectations.

And normality is dangerous.

Because peace revives public questions:

Why are prices still rising?

Where are the reforms?

Why does sacrifice remain one-sided?

War suspends accountability.

Peace restores it.

This is the philosophical center of the text.

8. Crisis as a System of Rule

At its deepest level, the text suggests:

some governments do not merely survive crises—they structurally require them.

War, inflation, regional instability, and shortages are not interruptions.

They are governance environments.

Power operates through:

permanent exceptionalism.

Without crisis, legitimacy weakens.

Conclusion

This is not simply satire about economic policy.

It is a critique of:

crisis-based governance

political dependency on external blame

the normalization of public hardship

It reveals a system where:

peace threatens authority more than war does.

Because peace removes the excuse.

And once the excuse disappears, only responsibility remains.

Final Critical Statement

By presenting the end of war as a governmental disappointment, this satirical text exposes one of the most disturbing truths of modern political administration: that crisis can become not an obstacle to governance, but its most reliable instrument—turning peace itself into a political problem.

The Tragedy of Peace: When War Ends Too Soon for Economic Reform

Full Analytical Reading for International Publication

This satirical text offers one of the sharpest critiques of economic governance through irony, by presenting peace not as relief, but as a political inconvenience.

At its center lies a brilliant inversion:

the government is disappointed not by war itself, but by the fact that the war ended too quickly.

This reversal transforms conventional political expectations and exposes a deeper logic:

crisis is not always a problem for power—sometimes it is its most useful administrative tool.

1. Peace as a Political Problem

The text opens with Prime Minister Mostafa Madbouly expressing disappointment over the rapid end of the Iran–U.S. war.

Normally, the end of war signifies:

economic relief

political stability

public optimism

Here, however, peace creates:

governmental frustration

administrative embarrassment

policy disruption

This inversion reveals the satirical thesis:

war had become economically useful.

The conflict functioned as a perfect external justification for:

fuel price increases

electricity hikes

transportation costs

declining living standards

Peace destroys that excuse.

2. The Political Economy of Excuses

The text brilliantly reframes governance as:

the management of explanations.

The Prime Minister is not primarily solving economic problems; he is searching for:

acceptable narratives to justify them.

This exposes a critical feature of many political systems:

legitimacy often depends less on solutions than on persuasive blame allocation.

Instead of reforming structural problems, power seeks:

wars

pandemics

regional instability

foreign disruptions

as rhetorical shields.

3. Externalizing Responsibility

The list of possible future justifications is intentionally excessive:

Sudan

Gaza

Libya

Ethiopia

Somalia

the Houthis in Yemen

This accumulation reveals how external crises are mobilized as:

permanent explanatory reservoirs.

The satire here is not simply about dishonesty, but about institutional dependency:

governance becomes addicted to external crises.

Without them, the internal structure stands exposed.

4. Inflation Without Drama

Perhaps the strongest satirical moment comes when the government considers:

raising prices regularly without waiting for external disasters.

This is presented almost as an innovation in administrative honesty.

The absurdity reveals a serious truth:

exceptional measures often become permanent systems.

Emergency pricing becomes normal policy.

Crisis ceases to be temporary and becomes:

a governing model.

5. The Bureaucracy of Suffering

The proposal for “scheduled price increases” transforms hardship into:

predictable policy

routine administration

normalized austerity

This is deeply revealing.

Pain is no longer accidental.

It is planned.

The citizen becomes not a protected subject, but a managed variable inside a fiscal equation.

6. Silence Around Wages and Services

The text sharply contrasts:

constant price increases

with the absence of:

salary improvements

pension reform

public service development

access to essential goods

This asymmetry exposes a familiar political imbalance:

sacrifice is socialized, while relief is indefinitely postponed.

The satire works because the logic feels recognizable.

7. Peace as Administrative Threat

The reopening of the Strait of Hormuz becomes symbolically dangerous.

Why?

Because peace restores normality.

And normality demands accountability.

War allows suspension of questions.

Peace reintroduces them.

This is perhaps the deepest insight of the text:

stability can be politically dangerous when power depends on emergency.

8. Philosophical Core: Governance Through Perpetual Crisis

At its deepest level, the text argues that:

some governments do not manage crises—they require them.

War, inflation, shortages, geopolitical tension:

these are not interruptions of governance.

They are part of its operating environment.

The system survives through:

permanent exceptionalism.

Conclusion

This text is not merely a joke about economic policy.

It is a structural critique of:

authoritarian administration

crisis-based legitimacy

the normalization of public suffering

It reveals a world in which:

peace threatens power more than war does.

Because peace asks the forbidden question:

If the excuse is gone—what remains?

Final Critical Statement

By portraying the end of war as a governmental disappointment, this satirical text exposes one of the darkest mechanisms of modern political economy: the transformation of crisis from an obstacle into a governing resource, where peace itself becomes a threat to administrative survival.